Thinking and Working Together and with Dogs
When you read about early police dog training as we did in the Konrad Most book, you see that the instructors taught the handlers to train the dogs, knowing what worked, and always willing to learn from the dogs. They still do that. They build and build and build on what we have learned from experience about dogs to move forward.
The Pfaffenberger book discusses his experience with family dogs going through the defense dog program OFF TO WAR! In this country! And then back home after the war to their families again! Humans and dogs are at their best when allowed to try, not knowing for sure if it will work.
Our culture is moving the wrong way in those respects. People want to too tightly control things; legally, socially and financially. Many of the best dog books now are self-published works, because too much of book publishing is controlled by huge corporations who treat the business solely as an investment. They do things like put a corporate person in charge who doesn't know the subject but presumably knows "what sells."
Turns out that isn't even a smart strategy for making money. People keep discovering new ideas and wanting to learn more about them. Corporations don't have a model for that. Some of the marketing books explore things like "the tipping point" in an effort to explain why suddenly an idea comes out of nowhere and makes a fortune.
Corporations are neither good nor evil. They're not human, after all. They're a different organism altogether, with "drives" (there's that word again!) to survive and to grow. They also lack intuition and anything approaching brilliance. Only people have such qualities, and only to the extent that a person keeps control of the reigns of a company can that company have human qualities.
Economically, small businesses are better for a country's financial stability and provide more jobs. Just not as many all in one lump, which means the politician can't point to the accomplishment of having brought 2000 jobs to the state by attracting that company. We'd all be better off and happier in myriad ways with more small businesses and fewer of the corporations that are suffocating us.
Legally we have people who think problems get solved by passing laws that "other people" will have to obey but of course "will never apply to me." Politicians like laws because it gets their names in the news and improves their chances of re-election. And now we're dealing with scary anti-dog legistation as a result.
Socially we have people who want the world to operate according to "if you don't agree with me, shut up." Civil discussion is harder to come by when people don't respect each other's rights to view things differently. If we were all alike, we could not learn from each other. It's part of our basic design to perceve the world differently and as a society to be able to benefit from the different viewpoints people get out of their genetics, their physical traits, and their experiences in life.
This is very interesting to ponder as I watch my Belgian Tervuren morph into helping handle the old Terv as a tending task rather than a pack-structure task. The old dog is 13 and losing the male recently seemed to bring the two females to a crossroads in pack structure. For one thing, they didn't seem to be a pack anymore. Nature seemed to be telling both of them that the appropriate thing was for the younger to kill the older, but the younger looked to me for my wishes in the matter. I did not reinforce any competition and I strongly reinforced all moves on the part of either dog to "stand down" from it. She determined her shepherd's wishes, and set about carrying them out.
It's been 4 months now, and the younger, who seems to just absolutely adore the opportunities to solve problems together with me, treats the old dog as sort of a cranky livestock animal who has canine behaviors. She never did seem to take the other dog's attacks personally, and now she doesn't even respond to get the old one under control. She just follows my lead and ignores it. The older one never did bite, anyway. It's just been sound and fury. With no male dog in the group, it's as if us girls can work out different rules.
For the first couple of years, the old dog wouldn't even let the younger one retrieve if she was in position to stop her. That had the paradoxical effect of turning the youngster into a lightning-fast retriever, once I'd taught her to do it in sessions away from home over time. The older dog finally gave up, but we other girls still keep a close eye on her in any retrieving situation in order to prevent unnecessary conflicts.
I asked the younger to get me something yesterday, and the old girl positioned herself so the young one would have to pass her on the way back. I wanted to tell the younger to come around through the room with the slick floor, which doesn't bother her but does give the old dog pause. Before I could figure out how to cue it, here she came, sailing to me from that direction.
Of course big praise and petting with loving eye contact to my younger heroine, and once again she is proud of herself for sizing up the task and the tools and making the best solution of it. I expect she could have been a good sheep herding dog. I think she finds her life very satisfying, because it gives her many opportunities to use her genetic gifts. I love reinforcing a dog for trying, for thinking, for problem solving, and for offering up so much service to me. Yes, I trained her, but what she does goes far beyond that. Her mind and heart are so open to learning. She inspires me.